- Research
- Open access
- Published:
Prospective associations of infant food exposures and appetitive traits with early childhood diet quality
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity volume 21, Article number: 143 (2024)
Abstract
Background
Early-life food exposures may influence food preferences and receptivity, thereby impacting long-term diet quality. Infant exposure to discretionary foods may be more detrimental for infants with high food approach traits; conversely, early exposure to fruits and vegetables may be more important for those with high food avoidance traits. This study investigated associations of infant food exposures with early childhood diet quality and whether these associations are modified by infant appetitive traits.
Methods
Data are from the Pregnancy Eating Attributes Study (PEAS) and Sprouts follow-up study, a prospective cohort assessed from the first trimester of pregnancy through early childhood. Birthing parents completed the Baby Eating Behavior Questionnaire assessing food-approach and food-avoidance appetitive traits at 6 months and food frequency questionnaires assessing infant age at introduction to and frequency of consuming food groups at ages 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. At child ages 3.5 and 5 years, parents provided two 24-h dietary recalls, from which the Healthy Eating Index-2020 was calculated to measure diet quality. Structural equation models using maximum likelihood estimation examined associations of age at introduction to, and intake frequency of, fruit/vegetables and discretionary foods, and their interactions with food-approach and food-avoidance appetitive traits, on child diet quality at ages 3.5 & 5 years, controlling for income, education, and breastfeeding duration.
Results
Higher childhood diet quality was associated with later infant age at introduction to discretionary foods, lower intake of discretionary foods at ages 1 and 2 years, and greater intake of fruits and vegetables at age 2 years. Childhood diet quality was not associated with infant age at introduction to fruits and vegetables. Intake of fruits and vegetables at age 1 year interacted with food avoidance traits, indicating that the association of fruit and vegetable intake with childhood diet quality was magnified by greater food avoidance.
Conclusions
Exposure to discretionary food in the first two years of life was consistently associated with lower diet quality in early childhood regardless of the strength of appetitive traits. Findings suggest that improving child diet quality may require stronger efforts to limit exposure to discretionary foods in infancy.
Background
The impact of nutrition in the first thousand days on long-term health is recognized by medical and public health professionals [1,2,3]. Healthful dietary intake during this time promotes optimal physical development [4, 3]; low diet quality is associated with disease risk including poorer cardiometabolic health [5,6,7], increased childhood asthma [8, 9], food allergies [10,11,12], and increased adiposity [5, 13,14,15]. Beyond the physical impact on development, early dietary intake lays the foundation for long-term dietary patterns.
Early food exposures may impact children’s diet quality long-term by influencing food preferences and receptivity to healthful foods such as vegetables, fruit, and whole grains [16]. Conversely, early and frequent exposure to discretionary foods (e.g., desserts, salty snacks) may reduce motivation for and intake of healthful foods, while increasing expectations and requests for discretionary foods [17]. As such, intake patterns may track across development. Intake of vegetables, fruits, noncore (discretionary) foods, and sugar-sweetened beverages in infancy predicted intake of the corresponding food groups in early childhood [18,19,20,21]. Similarly, infant overall diet quality [22] and later introduction of sugar-sweetened beverages [23] were associated with greater HEI in early childhood.
The influence of early feeding exposures on subsequent diet quality may vary depending on the child’s susceptibility to these exposures. Infants are predisposed to reject bitter tastes (e.g. green vegetables) [24, 25], but early preferences are modifiable through the introduction of vegetables early in complementary feeding [26,27,28], repeated exposures [25, 27, 29,30,31,32,33], and increased dietary variety [27, 31, 19, 33]. As such, exposure to healthful foods during the first two years of life, while taste preferences and food acceptance are developing, may be more critical for infants with stronger food avoidance traits. Conversely, infants innately prefer sweet tastes [34, 35] and begin to show preferences for salty tastes at approximately 4–6 months, leading to rapid acceptance of discretionary foods [34,35,36,37]. Consequently, early and frequent exposure to these foods may result in children subsequently preferring and seeking these foods, especially among those with stronger food approach traits. However, the interaction of infant appetitive traits with dietary exposures has not previously been examined.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the association of infant food exposures with early childhood diet quality, and the moderation of these associations by appetitive traits. We hypothesized that greater infant exposure to fruit and vegetables, and lower exposure to discretionary foods, would be associated with higher diet quality in early childhood. Further, we hypothesized that the association of infant fruit and vegetable exposure with child diet quality would be stronger among those with higher food avoidance traits, and that the association of infant discretionary food exposure with child diet quality would be stronger among those with higher food approach traits.
Methods
Design and participants
Data are from the Pregnancy Eating Attributes Study (PEAS) and Sprouts follow-up study, a prospective observational cohort followed from the first trimester of pregnancy through the offspring’s early childhood [38]. PEAS participants were recruited from two university-based obstetrics clinics in Chapel Hill, North Carolina from November 2014 through October 2016. Pregnant persons ≤ 12 weeks gestation were eligible if they met the following criteria: age ≥ 18 and < 45; BMI ≥ 18.5 kg/m2; able to complete self-report assessments in English; access to Internet with email; plan to deliver at the University of North Carolina (UNC) Women’s Hospital; plan to remain in the geographical vicinity of the clinical site for one year following delivery; and willingness to undergo study procedures and provide informed consent for self and offspring participation. Exclusion criteria included pre-existing diabetes; multiple pregnancy; participant-reported eating disorder; any medical condition contraindicating participation in the study such as chronic illnesses or use of medication that could affect diet or weight; and psychosocial condition contraindicating participation in the study. The study sample size was based on the primary research question examining associations of reward-related eating and the home food environment with diet and weight outcomes [38]. Participants who remained in PEAS through the one-year follow-up and who consented for future contact were eligible for enrollment in Sprouts at child age 3.5 years. Sprouts exclusion criteria were child diagnosis of neurocognitive disability or attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Sprouts enrollment was conducted from February 2019 to December 2020.
Procedures
PEAS study staff screened the electronic clinical appointments and medical records database to identify potential participants with upcoming clinic visits. During the clinic visit, staff verified eligibility and obtained written informed consent. PEAS study visits were conducted prenatally at < 12 weeks gestation, 16–22 weeks gestation, and 28–32 weeks gestation, and postpartum at 4–6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months. Self-report measures were completed online within each study visit window.
In anticipation of the Sprouts follow-up study, a brief online assessment was added at child age 2 years. Research staff contacted PEAS participants by email approximately one week prior to the child’s second birthday and invited them to participate in an online survey of their child’s current eating habits. Written information regarding the assessment was provided by email, including documentation that completion of the survey indicated consent for use of the data.
PEAS participants were invited by email to participate in Sprouts; those indicating willingness to participate were contacted by telephone to schedule the initial in-person assessment at child age 3.5 years. Parents provided written informed consent for their and their child’s participation. Due to public health precautions necessitated by the COVID-19 pandemic, recruitment and assessments were completed remotely beginning in March 2020; these parents received the consent form by email, were given the opportunity to ask questions, and confirmed consent via an online form prior to enrollment. Subsequently, assessments at child age 5 years were all completed remotely, rather than in-person as originally planned. Study procedures for PEAS (including the age 2 years assessment) and Sprouts were approved by the University of North Carolina Institutional Review Board.
Measures
Infant food exposures. Duration of any breastfeeding was measured using questions from the Infant Feeding Practices Study [39] at postpartum visits. Beginning at the 6-month visit, parents completed food frequency questionnaires based on validated assessments from the Infant Feeding Practices Study [39] and the Growing Leaps and Bounds study [40]. Items queried the age at which each food was introduced and the current frequency of intake. Responses across assessments were used to determine the age at introduction to selected food groups. At child age 2 years, parents completed a validated food frequency questionnaire developed for infants and toddlers [41]. Exposures examined included the age (in months) at introduction to fruit and vegetables, age at introduction to discretionary foods, and the frequency (times per day) of consuming each food group at ages 1 year and 2 years.
Infant appetitive traits. At 6 months postpartum, parents completed the Baby Eating Behavior Questionnaire, which measures appetitive traits during the period of exclusive milk-feeding. The measure includes two food approach subscales – food responsiveness (6 items, α = 0.80; e.g., “if given the chance my baby would always be feeding”) and enjoyment of food (4 items; α = 0.75; e.g., “my baby enjoyed feeding time”) and two food avoidance subscales – satiety responsiveness (3 items; α = 0.39; e.g., “my baby got full up easily”) and slowness in eating (4 items; α = 0.62; e.g., “my baby fed slowly”). Responses are provided on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = “never,” 5 = “always”). Items are reverse-scored when appropriate and subscales are scored as the mean of items, with a higher score indicate stronger endorsement of that trait. The measure has previously shown adequate psychometric properties including good internal consistency and a factor structure consistent with the constructs of interest [42].
Child diet quality. Parents completed two non-consecutive interviewer-administered 24-h dietary recalls associated with each Sprouts study visit, reporting all food and beverages consumed by the child the previous day, including details such as preparation method, portion size, brand names, and additions. Trained research staff administered the recall interviews using the multiple pass method and the Nutrition Data System for Research software version 2020 (Nutrition Coordinating Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota). Quality assurance checks were conducted by the UNC Nutrition Obesity Research Center – Diet and Physical Activity Core, including review of individual food entries above specified energy or weight thresholds and review of records above or below specified threshold energy intakes. Dietary intake data were used to calculate the Healthy Eating Index-2020 (HEI), an a priori indicator of diet quality that indicates conformance to the 2020 US Dietary Guidelines for Americans [43], at ages 3.5 and 5 years. The HEI was calculated across both diet records at each age using the simple scoring method, which sums 13 component scores, including 9 “adequacy components” (Total Fruit, Whole Fruit, Total Vegetables, Greens and Beans, Whole Grains, Dairy, Total Protein, Seafood and Plant Proteins, and Fatty Acids) and 4 “moderation components” (Refined Grains, Sodium, Added Sugars, and Saturated Fats), which are calculated on a per-1000 kcal, percent of energy, or intake ratio basis[44, 45]. All subscales are scored such that a higher score indicates greater adherence to dietary guidelines. The maximum score of 100 reflects adherence to all dietary guidelines. Dietary component scores representing adherence to adequacy components and to moderation components were also calculated.
Demographic characteristics. Parents reported sociodemographic information including household composition, income, education, marital status, race/ethnicity, and participation in Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) at the initial PEAS visit. Income-to-poverty ratio was calculated based on family income and household size [46]; higher values indicate greater income relative to the poverty threshold. Parent and child ages and parent parity were obtained from electronic medical records.
Analyses
Structural equation modeling using the lavaan package in R was used to examine associations of infant food exposures and their interactions with appetitive traits on early childhood diet quality. Three separate models examined associations of age at introduction to the two food groups and intake frequency of these food groups at ages 1 year and 2 years with early childhood diet quality. Each model used the same structure, differing only in the exposures tested (Fig. 1). Early childhood diet quality was modeled as a latent variable, indicated by the HEI at 3.5 and 5 years of age. Food avoidance was modeled as a latent variable indicated by satiety responsiveness and slowness in eating. Food approach was modeled as a latent variable indicated by food responsiveness and enjoyment of food. Direct effects of the food exposures and appetitive traits on child diet quality were tested. Analyses employed a two-step modeling process to test interaction effects [47, 48]. In the first step, the measurement model for the latent variables was estimated, and factor scores for food avoidance and food approach traits were predicted for each participant. These scores were then used to create interaction terms with the food exposure variables. A two-stage maximum likelihood procedure was used to handle missing data. Participant characteristics hypothesized to be associated with the exposures and outcomes were evaluated for inclusion as covariates, including income, education, WIC participation, and duration of breastfeeding. Income, education, and duration of breastfeeding were associated with at least one exposure and one outcome, and so were included as covariates in the models. Secondary analyses employed the same models as above, but with either the HEI-adequacy component score or the HEI-moderation component score as the outcome.
Results
Of 458 participants enrolled in PEAS, 321 were retained through one-year postpartum, 280 provided data at child age 2 years, 162 were enrolled in Sprouts at child age 3.5 years (132 in-person and 30 remotely), and 132 provided remote data at child age 5 years (113 who had completed the age 3.5-year assessment and 19 additional participants who had missed the age 3.5-year assessment). Characteristics of PEAS participants who were retained through one-year postpartum and those participating in either of the first two waves of Sprouts are summarized in Table 1. Sample characteristics of those enrolling in Sprouts were similar to those of the retained PEAS sample, with more than 90% married, nearly a quarter with a bachelor's degree or higher, and approximately 70% non-Hispanic White.
Descriptive information on the exposures and outcomes is provided in Table 2. Mean age at introduction to fruit and vegetables was 5.7 months, while mean age at introduction to discretionary foods was 7.8 months. Mean intake of fruit and vegetables at ages 1 and 2 years was 4.7 and 5.5 times/day, respectively. Intake of discretionary foods was 1.7 and 3.1 times/day, respectively, at ages 1 and 2 years. HEI at both ages 3.5 and 5 years was approximately 59.
Structural equation models examining associations of infant food exposures with early childhood diet quality, overall and for adequacy and moderation components, are shown in Figs. 2–4. Age at introduction to fruit and vegetables was not associated with overall early childhood diet quality. Later age at introduction to discretionary foods was associated with better diet quality in early childhood; this association was not moderated by infant food approach traits. Associations of later age at introduction to discretionary foods with adequacy and moderation components of early childhood diet quality were of similar magnitude (Fig. 2).
Associations of infant age at introduction to fruits/vegetables and discretionary foods and appetitive traits with early childhood diet quality
Coefficients for the model with total diet quality as the outcome are shown in black (CFI 0.84, TLI 0.93, RMSEA 0.05, SRMR 0.08). Coefficients for the model with adequacy components as the outcome are shown in green (CFI 0.94, TLI 0.93, RMSEA 0.05, SRMR 0.08). Coefficients for the model with moderation components as the outcome are shown in red (CFI 0.94, TLI 0.92, RMSEA 0.05, SRMR 0.08). * indicates p < 0.05, ** indicates p < 0.01, *** indicates p < 0.001
The main effect of the frequency of fruit and vegetable intake at age 1 year on overall early childhood diet quality was not significant; however, a significant interaction term indicated that the association was stronger among infants with greater food avoidance traits. In models examining adequacy and moderation components separately, fruit and vegetable intake at age 1 year was positively associated with early childhood adequacy components, and this association was stronger among infants higher in food avoidance traits. Fruit and vegetable intake at age 1 year was not associated with early childhood moderation components. Discretionary food intake at age 1 year was inversely associated with overall early childhood diet quality, and there was no interaction with food approach traits. Further, discretionary food intake at age 1 year was similarly associated with early childhood adequacy and moderation components (Fig. 3).
Associations of intake frequency of fruits/vegetables and discretionary foods at age 1 year and appetitive traits with early childhood diet quality
Coefficients for the model with total diet quality as the outcome are shown in black (CFI 0.96, TLI 0.96, RMSEA 0.04, SRMR 0.08). Coefficients for the model with adequacy components as the outcome are shown in green (CFI 0.96, TLI 0.95, RMSEA 0.04, SRMR 0.08). Coefficients for the model with moderation components as the outcome are shown in red (CFI 0.95, TLI 0.94, RMSEA 0.04, SRMR 0.08). * indicates p < 0.05, ** indicates p < 0.01, *** indicates p < 0.001.
Early childhood diet quality was associated positively with fruit and vegetable intake and negatively with discretionary food intake at age 2 years; neither association was moderated by infant appetitive traits. These associations were of similar magnitude in models examining adequacy components and those examining moderation components (Fig. 4).
Associations of intake frequency of fruits/vegetables and discretionary foods at age 2 years and appetitive traits with early childhood diet quality
Coefficients for the model with total diet quality as the outcome are shown in black (CFI 0.91, TLI 0.89, RMSEA 0.06, SRMR 0.10). Coefficients for the model with adequacy components as the outcome are shown in green (CFI 0.90, TLI 0.88, RMSEA 0.06, SRMR 0.10). Coefficients for the model with moderation components as the outcome are shown in red (CFI 0.90, TLI 0.88, RMSEA 0.06, SRMR 0.10). * indicates p < 0.05, ** indicates p < 0.01, *** indicates p < 0.001
Discussion
In this cohort of children followed from birth through age 5 years, exposures to fruit and vegetables and to discretionary foods in the first two years of life were prospectively associated with early childhood diet quality. These associations may be driven both by parent values and preferences when choosing foods to feed their child as well as by child preferences and behaviors developed in response to previous food exposures. The extent to which the associations observed herein were attributable to each of these aspects cannot be determined from this study. However, observational and experimental research demonstrating associations of infant food exposures with subsequent acceptance, preferences, and intake [19, 28, 33, 49, 50] suggests a mechanism by which infant food exposures may impact long-term diet quality.
The association of exposure to fruit and vegetables with child diet quality varied across exposure assessments and by infant appetitive traits. While fruit and vegetable intake at two years of age was associated with subsequent diet quality regardless of appetitive traits, the association of intake at one year of age with child diet quality was moderated by food avoidance traits, suggesting a possible critical window of exposure to fruits and vegetables for children with greater food avoidance. The absence of an association of age at introduction to fruits and vegetables with childhood diet quality suggests that regular exposure to fruits and vegetables across development may be more important than the initial timing of introduction. Alternatively, since more than three-quarters of the sample introduced fruits and vegetables by six months of age, there may have been insufficient variance to observe an association, if one exists.
Discretionary foods were introduced early and fed regularly (on average, nearly twice a day at one year of age and more than three times a day at two years of age) in this relatively highly educated sample. Exposure to discretionary foods in the first two years of life (including age at introduction, intake at age one year, and intake at age two years) was consistently associated with lower childhood diet quality. These associations were observed for both adequacy and moderation components, suggesting that exposure to discretionary foods in infancy may reduce children’s subsequent acceptance of healthful foods. Additionally, infant appetitive traits did not modify associations of infant exposure to discretionary foods with early childhood diet quality. Appetitive traits are believed to reflect individual susceptibility to an obesogenic food environment [51, 52]. However, the consistent direct association of early exposure to discretionary food with subsequent worse diet quality across all analyses, along with the absence of moderation by appetitive traits, suggests that children are susceptible to discretionary foods across the range of stronger and weaker food approach traits.
Consistent associations of discretionary food exposure in the first two years of life with child diet quality suggest the need for greater efforts to reduce exposure to discretionary foods during this developmental period. Current dietary guidelines recommend that parents avoid feeding foods with added sugars in the first two years of life [53]. Yet parents have reported perceiving such recommendations as unrealistic due to the prevalence of these foods in the home and their intake by other members of the family [54, 55]. Parents report feeding discretionary foods not only for their convenience and acceptability, but also to entertain their infant and to show affection [55,56,57]. As such, public health approaches to promote healthful infant feeding may require improving both the household and the broader food environment and reshaping social norms regarding appropriate foods for infants.
Findings from this study are subject to limitations imposed by the study design and sample. The sample was recruited from a single geographic area that is more highly educated and less diverse than the US population, which may limit generalizability. Additionally, parent report of infant feeding exposures may be subject to social desirability bias, and report of age at introduction to foods may also be subject to recall bias, both of which would likely increase type II error. Despite validation of the Baby Eating Behaviors Questionnaire across numerous samples, the low internal consistency of the 3-item satiety responsiveness subscale suggests this measure may not represent a distinct construct in this sample. However, fit indices for the structural equation models, in which the latent variable of food avoidance traits was indicated by both satiety responsiveness and slowness in eating, were adequate. While there was considerable attrition from PEAS to Sprouts, partly attributable to the COVID-19 pandemic, the sociodemographic characteristics of the Sprouts participants were similar to those of the original sample. The prospective study design, use of validated measures including 24-h recalls assessing early childhood dietary intake, and consideration of sociodemographic covariates all support the internal validity of the findings.
Conclusions
Findings from this study contribute to a growing body of evidence indicating that dietary exposures in infancy may play a crucial role in shaping long-term diet quality. While the interaction of fruit and vegetable intake at age 1 year with appetitive traits suggests a possible sensitive period for infants high in food avoidance traits, most associations were not modified by appetitive traits, indicating the importance of healthful infant exposures for all children. Exposure to discretionary food in the first two years of life was common and was consistently associated with lower diet quality in early childhood – both adequacy and moderation components – regardless of the strength of appetitive traits. Findings suggest that improving child diet quality may require stronger efforts to limit exposure to discretionary foods in infancy.
Availability of data and materials
Data described in the manuscript, code book, and analytic code will be made available upon request pending approval of a data use agreement. Following publication of the study objectives, de-identified data will be shared in the NICHD Data and Specimen Hub.
Abbreviations
- HEI:
-
Healthy Eating Index
- PEAS:
-
Pregnancy Eating Attributes Study
- UNC:
-
University of North Carolina
References
Hamner HC, Nelson JM, Sharma AJ, Jefferds MED, Dooyema C, Flores-Ayala R, et al. Improving Nutrition in the First 1000 Days in the United States: A Federal Perspective. Am J Public Health. 2022;112(S8):S817–25.
Likhar A, Patil MS. Importance of Maternal Nutrition in the First 1,000 Days of Life and Its Effects on Child Development: A Narrative Review. Cureus. 2022;14(10):e30083.
Schwarzenberg SJ, Georgieff MK. Advocacy for Improving Nutrition in the First 1000 Days to Support Childhood Development and Adult Health. Pediatrics. 2018;141(2):e20173716.
Georgieff MK, Brunette KE, Tran PV. Early life nutrition and neural plasticity. Dev Psychopathol. 2015;27(2):411–23.
Ong YY, Pang WW, Michael N, Aris IM, Sadananthan SA, Tint M-T, et al. Timing of introduction of complementary foods, breastfeeding, and child cardiometabolic risk: a prospective multiethnic Asian cohort study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2023;117(1):83–92.
Brazionis L, Golley RK, Mittinty MN, Smithers LG, Emmett P, Northstone K, Lynch JW. Diet spanning infancy and toddlerhood is associated with child blood pressure at age 7.5 y. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;97(6):1375–86.
Calcaterra V, Mannarino S, Garella V, Rossi V, Biganzoli EM, Zuccotti G. Cardiovascular Risk in Pediatrics: A Dynamic Process during the First 1000 Days of Life. Pediatric Reports. 2023;15(4):636–59.
Verduci E, Martelli A, Miniello VL, Landi M, Mariani B, Brambilla M, et al. Nutrition in the first 1000 days and respiratory health: A descriptive review of the last five years’ literature. Allergol Immunopathol. 2017;45(4):405–13.
Güngör D, Nadaud P, LaPergola CC, Dreibelbis C, Wong YP, Terry N, et al. Infant milk-feeding practices and food allergies, allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis, and asthma throughout the life span: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr. 2019;109:772S-S799.
Soriano VX, Ciciulla D, Gell G, Wang Y, Peters RL, McWilliam V, et al. Complementary and Allergenic Food Introduction in Infants: An Umbrella Review. Pediatrics. 2023;151(2): e2022058380.
Obbagy JE, English LK, Wong YP, Butte NF, Dewey KG, Fleischer DM, et al. Complementary feeding and food allergy, atopic dermatitis/eczema, asthma, and allergic rhinitis: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr. 2019;109:890S-934S.
Zhong C, Guo J, Tan T, Wang H, Lin L, Gao D, et al. Increased food diversity in the first year of life is inversely associated with allergic outcomes in the second year. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2022;33(1): e13707.
Cohen CC, Harrall KK, Hu H, Glueck DH, Perng W, Shankar K, Dabelea D. Associations of infant feeding practices with abdominal and hepatic fat measures in childhood in the longitudinal Healthy Start Study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2024;119(2):560–8.
English LK, Obbagy JE, Wong YP, Butte NF, Dewey KG, Fox MK, et al. Types and amounts of complementary foods and beverages consumed and growth, size, and body composition: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr. 2019;109:956S-S977.
English LK, Obbagy JE, Wong YP, Butte NF, Dewey KG, Fox MK, et al. Timing of introduction of complementary foods and beverages and growth, size, and body composition: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr. 2019;109:935S-S955.
Mura Paroche M, Caton SJ, Vereijken C, Weenen H, Houston-Price C. How Infants and Young Children Learn About Food: A Systematic Review. Front Psychol. 2017;8:1046.
Lalanza JF, Snoeren EMS. The cafeteria diet: A standardized protocol and its effects on behavior. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021;122:92–119.
Grimm KA, Kim SA, Yaroch AL, Scanlon KS. Fruit and vegetable intake during infancy and early childhood. Pediatrics. 2014;134 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S63–9.
Mallan KM, Fildes A, Magarey AM, Daniels LA. The Relationship between Number of Fruits, Vegetables, and Noncore Foods Tried at Age 14 Months and Food Preferences, Dietary Intake Patterns, Fussy Eating Behavior, and Weight Status at Age 3.7 Years. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. 2016;116(4):630–7.
Pan L, Li R, Park S, Galuska DA, Sherry B, Freedman DS. A longitudinal analysis of sugar-sweetened beverage intake in infancy and obesity at 6 years. Pediatrics. 2014;134 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S29–35.
Rose CM, Birch LL, Savage JS. Dietary patterns in infancy are associated with child diet and weight outcomes at 6 years. Int J Obes (Lond). 2017;41(5):783–8.
Au LE, Arnold CD, Ritchie LD, Frongillo EA. The Infant Diet Quality Index Predicts Dietary and Adiposity Outcomes in US Children 2 to 4 years old. J Nutr. 2023;153(3):741–8.
Thompson IJB, Ritchie LD, Bradshaw PT, Mujahid MS, Au LE. Earlier Introduction to Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Associated With Lower Diet Quality Among WIC Children at Age 3 Years. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2021;53(11):912–20.
Mennella JA. Ontogeny of taste preferences: basic biology and implications for health12345. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014;99(3):704S-S711.
Ventura Alison K, Worobey J. Early Influences on the Development of Food Preferences. Curr Biol. 2013;23(9):R401–8.
Chambers L. Complementary feeding: Vegetables first, frequently and in variety. Nutr Bull. 2016;41(2):142–6.
Nicklaus S. Complementary Feeding Strategies to Facilitate Acceptance of Fruits and Vegetables: A Narrative Review of the Literature. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13(11):1160.
Lange C, Visalli M, Jacob S, Chabanet C, Schlich P, Nicklaus S. Maternal feeding practices during the first year and their impact on infants’ acceptance of complementary food. Food Qual Prefer. 2013;29(2):89–98.
Spill MK, Johns K, Callahan EH, Shapiro MJ, Wong YP, Benjamin-Neelon SE, et al. Repeated exposure to food and food acceptability in infants and toddlers: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr. 2019;109:978S-S989.
Barends C, Weenen H, Warren J, Hetherington MM, de Graaf C, de Vries JHM. A systematic review of practices to promote vegetable acceptance in the first three years of life. Appetite. 2019;137:174–97.
Mennella JA, Reiter AR, Daniels LM. Vegetable and Fruit Acceptance during Infancy: Impact of Ontogeny, Genetics, and Early Experiences. Adv Nutr. 2016;7(1):211S-S219.
Barends C, de Vries J, Mojet J, de Graaf C. Effects of repeated exposure to either vegetables or fruits on infant’s vegetable and fruit acceptance at the beginning of weaning. Food Qual Prefer. 2013;29(2):157–65.
Schwartz C, Scholtens PA, Lalanne A, Weenen H, Nicklaus S. Development of healthy eating habits early in life. Review of recent evidence and selected guidelines. Appetite. 2011;57(3):796–807.
Schwartz C, Chabanet C, Szleper E, Feyen V, Issanchou S, Nicklaus S. Infant Acceptance of Primary Tastes and Fat Emulsion: Developmental Changes and Links with Maternal and Infant Characteristics. Chem Senses. 2017;42(7):593–603.
Birch LL, Doub AE. Learning to eat: birth to age 2 y1234. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014;99(3):723S-S728.
Liem DG. Infants’ and Children’s Salt Taste Perception and Liking: A Review. Nutrients. 2017;9(9):1011.
Stein LJ, Cowart BJ, Beauchamp GK. The development of salty taste acceptance is related to dietary experience in human infants: a prospective study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012;95(1):123–9.
Nansel TR, Lipsky LM, Siega-Riz AM, Burger K, Faith M, Liu A. Pregnancy eating attributes study (PEAS): a cohort study examining behavioral and environmental influences on diet and weight change in pregnancy and postpartum. BMC Nutr. 2016;2:45.
Fein SB, Labiner-Wolfe J, Shealy KR, Li R, Chen J, Grummer-Strawn LM. Infant feeding practices study II: study methods. Pediatrics. 2008;122(Supplement 2):S28–35.
Sharma S, Kolahdooz F, Butler L, Budd N, Rushovich B, Mukhina GL, et al. Assessing dietary intake among infants and toddlers 0–24 months of age in Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Nutr J. 2013;12:52.
Palacios C, Rivas-Tumanyan S, Santiago-Rodríguez EJ, Sinigaglia O, Ríos EM, Campos M, et al. A Semi-Quantitative Food Frequency Questionnaire Validated in Hispanic Infants and Toddlers Aged 0 to 24 Months. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017;117(4):526-35.e9.
Llewellyn CH, van Jaarsveld CH, Johnson L, Carnell S, Wardle J. Development and factor structure of the Baby Eating Behaviour Questionnaire in the Gemini birth cohort. Appetite. 2011;57(2):388–96.
Shams-White MM, Pannucci TE, Lerman JL, Herrick KA, Zimmer M, Meyers Mathieu K, et al. Healthy Eating Index-2020: Review and Update Process to Reflect the Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2020–2025. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2023;123(9):1280–8.
Krebs-Smith SM, Pannucci TE, Subar AF, Kirkpatrick SI, Lerman JL, Tooze JA, et al. Update of the Healthy Eating Index: HEI-2015. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018;118(9):1591–602.
Reedy J, Lerman JL, Krebs-Smith SM, Kirkpatrick SI, Pannucci TE, Wilson MM, et al. Evaluation of the Healthy Eating Index-2015. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018;118(9):1622–33.
U.S. Census Bureau PD, Fertility & Family Statistics Branch. Current population survey: definitions and explanations 2004 [Available from: http://www.census.gov/population/www/cps/cpsdef.html.
Lawley DN, Maxwell AE. Factor analysis as a statistical method. 2nd ed. London: Butterworths; 1971.
Jöreskog KG. Interaction and nonlinear modeling: issues and approaches. In: Schumacker RE, Marcoulides GA, editors. Interaction and nonlinear effects in structural equation modeling. 1st ed. New York: Routledge; 1998. p. 239–250.
Harris G, Coulthard H. Early Eating Behaviours and Food Acceptance Revisited: Breastfeeding and Introduction of Complementary Foods as Predictive of Food Acceptance. Curr Obes Rep. 2016;5(1):113–20.
Maier-Nöth A, Schaal B, Leathwood P, Issanchou S. The Lasting Influences of Early Food-Related Variety Experience: A Longitudinal Study of Vegetable Acceptance from 5 Months to 6 Years in Two Populations. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(3):e0151356.
Carnell S, Wardle J. Appetitive traits and child obesity: measurement, origins and implications for intervention: Symposium on ‘Behavioural nutrition and energy balance in the young.’ Proc Nutr Soc. 2008;67(4):343–55.
Carnell S, Wardle J. Appetite and adiposity in children: evidence for a behavioral susceptibility theory of obesity. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;88(1):22–9.
Committee Dietary Guidelines Advisory. Scientific Report of the 2020 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee: Advisory Report to the Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary of Health and Human Services. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service: Washington, DC; 2020.
Harris JL, Romo-Palafox MJ, Gershman H, Kagan I, Duffy V. Healthy Snacks and Drinks for Toddlers: A Qualitative Study of Caregivers’ Understanding of Expert Recommendations and Perceived Barriers to Adherence. Nutrients. 2023;15(4):1006.
Matvienko-Sikar K, Kelly C, Sinnott C, McSharry J, Houghton C, Heary C, et al. Parental experiences and perceptions of infant complementary feeding: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Obes Rev. 2018;19(4):501–17.
Isaacs A, Neve K, Hawkes C. Why do parents use packaged infant foods when starting complementary feeding? Findings from phase one of a longitudinal qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):2328.
Moore DA, Goodwin TL, Brocklehurst PR, Armitage CJ, Glenny AM. When Are Caregivers More Likely to Offer Sugary Drinks and Snacks to Infants? A Qualitative Thematic Synthesis. Qual Health Res. 2017;27(1):74–88.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
Open access funding provided by the National Institutes of Health This research was supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Intramural Research Program (contracts #HHSN275201300012C, #HHSN275201300026I/HHSN27500002, #HHSN275201800002I, and #HHSN275201800013I). Collection of dietary intake data was additionally supported by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK056350). The funding bodies had no role in the study design; collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; or writing of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
TRN, LL, KSB, GS, and AMSR designed the research. TRN directed data analysis. TRN and ACD wrote the paper; TRN had primary responsibility for final content. All authors provided substantive revisions to the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Study procedures were approved by the University of North Carolina Institutional Review Board, IRB #13–3848 and #18–2030. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors have no competing interests to declare.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Nansel, T.R., Channell-Doig, A., Lipsky, L.M. et al. Prospective associations of infant food exposures and appetitive traits with early childhood diet quality. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 21, 143 (2024). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12966-024-01686-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12966-024-01686-4