Skip to main content

Table 2 Imputed hierarchical multivariable linear regression analyses with parental lifestyle patterns. The EDEN study (N = 1962)

From: Socioecological correlates of parental lifestyle patterns during the antenatal period

Parental lifestyle pattern 1: high parental smoking, poor-quality maternal diet and low leisure PA

 

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3

β (95% CI)

P-value

β (95% CI)

P-value

β (95% CI)

P-value

Socioeconomic and demographic characteristics

Centre

Poitiers

ref

ref

    

Nancy

0.04 (-0.08, 0.15)

0.53

0.04 (-0.09, 0.16)

0.55

0.07 (-0.06, 0.20)

0.28

Maternal education level

High

ref

ref

    

Medium

0.35 (0.21, 0.50)

< .001

0.35 (0.21, 0.50)

< .001

0.32 (0.18, 0.47)

< .001

Low

0.93 (0.67, 1.18)

< .001

0.92 (0.67, 1.18)

< .001

0.83 (0.57, 1.09)

< .001

Paternal education

High

ref

ref

    

Medium

0.31 (0.17, 0.45)

< .001

0.30 (0.16, 0.45)

< .001

0.29 (0.14, 0.43)

< .001

Low

0.51 (0.29, 0.73)

< .001

0.50 (0.28, 0.73)

< .001

0.47 (0.24, 0.69)

< .001

Maternal employment

Employed/self-employed

ref

ref

    

Not employed

0.28 (0.13, 0.44)

< .001

0.27 (0.11, 0.42)

< .001

0.24 (0.08, 0.40)

0.003

Paternal employment

Employed/self-employed

ref

ref

    

Not employed

0.08 (-0.14, 0.30)

0.46

0.08 (-0.14, 0.30)

0.47

0.04 (-0.18, 0.26)

0.72

Parity

Primiparous

ref

ref

    

Multiparous

0.16 (0.04, 0.29)

0.01

0.16 (0.04, 0.29)

0.01

0.03 (-0.12, 0.17)

0.71

Household income

4th quartile (highest)

ref

ref

    

3rd quartile

0.12 (-0.04, 0.29)

0.14

0.13 (-0.04, 0.29)

0.13

0.13 (-0.03, 0.30)

0.11

2nd quartile

0.20 (0.02, 0.38)

0.03

0.20 (0.02, 0.38)

0.03

0.20 (0.02, 0.38)

0.03

1st quartile

0.41 (0.16, 0.67)

0.001

0.41 (0.16, 0.67)

0.002

0.35 (0.09, 0.60)

0.009

Parents live together

Yes

ref

ref

    

No

-0.09 (-0.36, 0.18)

0.52

-0.10 (-0.37, 0.17)

0.47

-0.13 (-0.40, 0.15)

0.37

Maternal age

-0.05 (-0.06, -0.03)

< .001

-0.05 (-0.06, -0.03)

< .001

− 0.04 (-0.06, -0.03)

< .001

Paternal age

-0.01 (-0.02, 0.01)

0.22

-0.01 (-0.02, 0.01)

0.22

-0.01 (-0.02, 0.00)

0.18

Mother born abroad

No

ref

ref

    

Yes

-0.39 (-0.70, -0.09)

0.01

-0.39 (-0.70, -0.09)

0.01

-0.41 (-0.71, -0.10)

0.01

Father born abroad

No

ref

ref

    

Yes

-0.22 (-0.46, 0.03)

0.08

-0.23 (-0.48, 0.02)

0.07

-0.26 (-0.51, -0.01)

0.038

Urban environment

Access to green space

  

0.06 (-0.01, 0.14)

0.10

0.06 (-0.01, 0.14)

0.11

Population density

  

-0.07 (-0.16, 0.02)

0.14

-0.06 (-0.15, 0.03)

0.17

Road and rail traffic

  

0.00 (-0.11, 0.11)

0.99

-0.01 (-0.12, 0.10)

0.9

Street connectivity density

  

0.01 (-0.09, 0.10)

0.89

0.01 (-0.09, 0.11)

0.84

Food facility density

Slightly unhealthy environment

  

ref

ref

  

Highly unhealthy environment

  

0.07 (-0.10, 0.24)

0.40

0.07 (-0.09, 0.24)

0.38

Facility richness

0

  

-0.02 (-0.24, 0.20)

0.88

-0.02 (-0.24, 0.20)

0.87

0-0.05

  

-0.03 (-0.21, 0.16)

0.79

-0.02 (-0.21, 0.16)

0.79

> 0.05

  

ref

ref

  

Area-level SES indicator (deprivation index in quintiles) during pregnancy

Low level of deprivation

  

ref

ref

  

Medium-low level of deprivation

  

0.06 (-0.11, 0.24)

0.47

0.06 (-0.11, 0.23)

0.48

Medium level of deprivation

  

0.14 (-0.05, 0.33)

0.14

0.15 (-0.04, 0.34)

0.12

Medium-high level of deprivation

  

0.09 (-0.11, 0.28)

0.38

0.07 (-0.12, 0.26)

0.47

High level of deprivation

  

0.12 (-0.08, 0.32)

0.25

0.10 (-0.10, 0.30)

0.34

Psychosocial factors and health-care access

Psychiatric disorders during pregnancy

No

    

ref

ref

Yes

    

0.00 (-0.25, 0.25)

1

Free/subsidised health insurance for very low-income families or no complementary insurance

No

    

ref

ref

Yes

    

0.22 (-0.01, 0.45)

0.06

Antenatal visits

< 7

    

0.06 (-0.12, 0.24)

0.49

≥ 7

    

ref

ref

Antenatal preparation for parenting

No

    

0.29 (0.14, 0.44)

< .001

Yes for all

    

ref

ref

Yes for some

    

0.13 (-0.03, 0.30)

0.12

Parental lifestyle pattern 2: low parental BMI and high GWG

 

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3

β (95% CI)

P-value

β (95% CI)

P-value

β (95% CI)

P-value

Socioeconomic and demographic characteristics

Centre

Poitiers

ref

ref

ref

ref

  

Nancy

0.06 (-0.05, 0.16)

0.28

0.01 (-0.10, 0.12)

0.84

0.04 (-0.07, 0.16)

0.45

Maternal education level

High

ref

ref

ref

ref

  

Medium

-0.04 (-0.17, 0.09)

0.51

-0.03 (-0.16, 0.10)

0.65

-0.02 (-0.15, 0.11)

0.73

Low

0.15 (-0.08, 0.37)

0.21

0.15 (-0.08, 0.38)

0.19

0.18 (-0.05, 0.41)

0.13

Paternal education

High

ref

ref

ref

ref

  

Medium

-0.25 (-0.38, -0.13)

< .001

-0.23 (-0.36, -0.10)

< .001

-0.22 (-0.35, -0.10)

< .001

Low

-0.14 (-0.33, 0.06)

0.18

-0.11 (-0.31, 0.09)

0.27

-0.10 (-0.30, 0.10)

0.34

Maternal employment

Employed/self-employed

ref

ref

    

Not employed

-0.03 (-0.17, 0.11)

0.65

-0.03 (-0.17, 0.11)

0.69

-0.02 (-0.16, 0.12)

0.74

Paternal employment

Employed/self-employed

ref

ref

ref

ref

  

Not employed

0.03 (-0.16, 0.22)

0.76

0.01 (-0.18, 0.20)

0.93

0.03 (-0.16, 0.22)

0.75

Parity

Primiparous

ref

ref

ref

ref

  

Multiparous

-0.22 (-0.33, -0.10)

< .001

-0.20 (-0.32, -0.09)

< .001

-0.17 (-0.30, -0.04)

0.009

Household income

4th quartile (highest)

ref

ref

    

3rd quartile

-0.19 (-0.33, -0.04)

0.01

-0.18 (-0.33, -0.03)

0.02

-0.18 (-0.33, -0.03)

0.02

2nd quartile

-0.32 (-0.48, -0.16)

< .001

-0.32 (-0.48, -0.16)

< .001

-0.32 (-0.48, -0.16)

< .001

1st quartile

-0.26 (-0.48, -0.03)

0.03

-0.25 (-0.48, -0.02)

0.03

-0.24 (-0.47, -0.01)

0.04

Parents live together

Yes

ref

ref

    

No

0.02 (-0.22, 0.26)

0.9

0.03 (-0.21, 0.27)

0.8

0.06 (-0.18, 0.30)

0.62

Maternal age

-0.01 (-0.03, 0.00)

0.11

-0.01 (-0.03, 0.00)

0.11

-0.01 (-0.03, 0.00)

0.12

Paternal age

-0.02 (-0.04, -0.01)

< .001

-0.02 (-0.03, -0.01)

0.001

-0.02 (-0.03, -0.01)

0.002

Mother born abroad

No

ref

ref

    

Yes

-0.23 (-0.50, 0.04)

0.10

-0.26 (-0.54, 0.01)

0.06

-0.30 (-0.57, -0.02)

0.03

Father born abroad

No

ref

ref

    

Yes

0.02 (-0.20, 0.23)

0.89

0.00 (-0.21, 0.22)

0.99

0.03 (-0.19, 0.25)

0.79

Urban environment

Access to green space

  

-0.04 (-0.10, 0.02)

0.17

-0.04 (-0.10, 0.02)

0.18

Population density

  

0.13 (0.06, 0.21)

< .001

0.13 (0.06, 0.21)

< .001

Road and rail traffic

  

0.00 (-0.09, 0.08)

0.98

0.00 (-0.09, 0.08)

0.96

Street connectivity density

  

0.00 (-0.09, 0.08)

0.95

0.00 (-0.08, 0.08)

1

Food facility density

Slightly unhealthy environment

  

ref

ref

  

Highly unhealthy environment

  

0.04 (-0.11, 0.19)

0.61

0.04 (-0.11, 0.19)

0.58

Facility richness

0

  

0.00 (-0.20, 0.19)

0.97

0.01 (-0.19, 0.21)

0.91

0-0.05

  

-0.05 (-0.21, 0.12)

0.58

-0.04 (-0.20, 0.13)

0.67

> 0.05

  

ref

ref

  

Area-level socioeconomic indicator during pregnancy

Low level of deprivation

  

ref

ref

  

Medium-low level of deprivation

  

-0.02 (-0.17, 0.13)

0.81

-0.02 (-0.17, 0.13)

0.81

Medium level of deprivation

  

0.00 (-0.16, 0.17)

0.96

0.01 (-0.16, 0.17)

0.95

Medium-high level of deprivation

  

-0.11 (-0.28, 0.06)

0.21

-0.10 (-0.27, 0.07)

0.23

High level of deprivation

  

-0.21 (-0.39, -0.03)

0.02

-0.20 (-0.38, -0.02)

0.03

Psychosocial factors and health-care access

Psychiatric disorders during pregnancy

No

    

ref

ref

Yes

    

-0.29 (-0.51, -0.07)

0.01

Free/subsidised health insurance for very low-income families or no complementary insurance

No

    

ref

ref

Yes

    

-0.07 (-0.27, 0.14)

0.53

Antenatal visits

< 7

    

0.18 (0.02, 0.34)

0.03

≥ 7

    

ref

ref

Antenatal preparation for parenting

No

    

-0.09 (-0.23, 0.05)

0.19

Yes for all

    

ref

ref

Yes for some

    

-0.11 (-0.25, 0.04)

0.15

  1. PA: physical activity; model 1 included socioeconomic, and demographic factors, model 2 included urban environment factors and model 3 psychosocial factors and access to health care. For the sake of parsimony, the effect of each variable was adjusted for the other variables from the same block, and additionally adjusted for variables from the preceding block. Coefficients are interpreted when the variable appear the first time but we showed effects for further models for indication