Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Table 4 Subgroup analysis of HbA1c regression

From: The efficacy of using continuous glucose monitoring as a behaviour change tool in populations with and without diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Subgroup

Studies

Mean difference

95% CI

p

I2

Difference between subgroups (p)

HbA1c at baseline

0.524

< 8%

10

-0.24

-0.36, -0.11

< 0.001

85.8

 

≥ 8%

13

-0.33

-0.56, -0.09

0.007

90.6

 

Insulin use at baseline

0.798

No participants

6

-0.31

-0.53, -0.10

0.004

89.3

 

Some / all participants or unspecified

17

-0.27

-0.45, -0.10

0.002

89.9

 

Duration of sensor wear

0.867

≤ 28 days

13

-0.30

-0.50, -0.09

0.004

87.3

 

≥ 29 days

10

-0.27

-0.46, -0.08

0.005

90.4

 

Use of glucometer in control group

0.622

No

8

-0.34

-0.61, -0.07

0.015

90.0

 

Yes

15

-0.26

-0.42, -0.10

0.002

87.8

 

CGM feedback with 2-way communication

0.891

No

10

-0.30

-0.48, -0.12

0.001

90.8

 

Yes

13

-0.28

-0.49, -0.07

0.010

86.3

 

Behaviour tracking in intervention group

0.392

No

10

-0.35

-0.53, -0.17

< 0.001

88.2

 

Yes

13

-0.23

-0.43, -0.03

0.026

88.7