The efficacy of using continuous glucose monitoring as a behaviour change tool in populations with and without diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Table 2 Summary of key outcome differences between intervention and comparison groups using CGM for behaviour change

Outcome	Studies	Participants (I/C)	I²	Mean difference (95% CI)	p
HbA1c (%)	23	1135/1220	88.5%	-0.28 (-0.42, -0.15)	< 0.001
TIR (%)	10	608/520	80.5%	7.4 (2.0, 12.8)	0.008
TAR (%)	8	426/326	84.0%	-3.8 (-11.8, 4.2)	0.352
Weight (kg)	8	299/392	0.0%	-0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)	0.066
BMI (kg/m²)	9	343/418	18.5%	-0.4 (-0.9, 0.0)	0.080

Abbreviations: HbA1c: glycated haemoglobin, BMI: body mass index, TIR: time above range, TAR: time below range, I/C: intervention/comparison

ISSN: 1479-5868