Skip to main content

Table 1 Researcher and practitioner interviewees’ demographic and evidence-based intervention characteristics

From: Advancing implementation science in community settings: the implementation strategies applied in communities (ISAC) compilation

Variable

Researchers (n = 10)

Practitioners (n = 8)

Years of Experience, M (SD)

9.4 (± 6.40)

15.8 (± 5.97)

Implementation Science Expertise, n (%)

  

 Beginner

2 (20)

n/a

 Intermediate

5 (50)

 Advanced

3 (30)

Geographic Region (US Census), n (%)

  

 Midwest

2 (20)

2 (25)

 Northeast

1 (10)

1 (12)

 South

6 (60)

4 (50)

 West

1 (10)

1 (12)

Number of Interventions Reported, M (SD)

2.0 (+ 0.83)

2.75 (+ 0.66)

Intervention Levels, n (%)

 Individual or interpersonal

4 (40)

1 (12)

 Policy, systems, or environmental

3 (30)

0 (0)

 Both levels

3 (30)

7 (88)

Intervention Outcomes, n (%)

 Physical Activity

3 (30)

0 (0)

 Tobacco

1 (10)

0 (0)

 Nutrition

0 (0)

2 (25)

 Multiple outcomes

6 (60)

6 (75)

Intervention Settings, n (%)

Research settings (n = 19)

Work settings (n = 35)

 Education

7 (37)

10 (29)

 Faith-Based

3 (16)

5 (14)

 Recreation/Sport

2 (11)

3 (9)

 Social Services

1 (5)

2 (6)

 City Planning & Transportation

1 (5)

2 (6)

 Workplaces

1 (5)

2 (6)

 Other Public Health

4 (21)

11 (31)