Table 4 Process evaluation results by SHHC-2.0 Group (n = 14)
Site (Town) | Reach a | Sessions Attended (%) | Dose Delivered b (%) | Fidelity c (%) | Session length, mean d | Total Session (hrs.) | Session effectiveness, mean (Range 1–5) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
County One | |||||||||
Town 1 (1) | 2.8% | 57.6% | 95.2% | 93.2% | 56.6 ± 9.7 | 45.3 | 3.9 | ||
Town 2 (2) | 1.6% | 63.7% | 94.8% | 91.6% | 58.0 ± 7.3 | 46.4 | 4.0 | ||
County Two | |||||||||
Town 3 – Group A (1) | 7.3% | 61.1% | 87.5% | 84.9% | 54.1 ± 9.8 | 43.3 | 4.2 | ||
Town 3 – Group B (1) | 63.1% | 87.4% | 85.1% | 52.3 ± 12.8 | 41.9 | 4.2 | |||
Town 4 – Group A (2) | 14.6% | 61.6% | 92.3% | 89.5% | 57.3 ± 7.8 | 45.8 | 4.3 | ||
Town 4 – Group B (2) | 42.0% | 91.1% | 88.2% | 56.6 ± 9.7 | 45.6 | 4.3 | |||
County Three | |||||||||
Town 5 – Group A (1) | 8.3% | 66.9% | 77.3% | 71.2% | 43.2 ± 13.8 | 32.3 | 4.0 | ||
Town 5 – Group B (1) | 53.6% | 73.9% | 68.0% | 38.5 ± 14.4 | 26.9 | 4.1 | |||
Town 6 (2) | 12.9% | 72.5% | 74.8% | 68.8% | 43.0 ± 11.5 | 33.7 | 4.8 | ||
Town 7 (2) | 15.7% | 56.9% | 73.5% | 67.4% | 42.1 ± 16.4 | 33.7 | 4.2 | ||
County Four | |||||||||
Town 8 (1) | 3.9% | 48.3% | 88.9% | 85.4% | 54.9 ± 9.7 | 43.0 | 3.7 | ||
Town 9 (2) | 0.7% | 60.0% | 87.4% | 84.5% | 58.0 ± 7.3 | 43.2 | 3.7 | ||
County Five | |||||||||
Town 10 (1) | 7.3% | 77.4% | 94.7% | 85.4% | 51.7 ± 13.1 | 41.3 | 4.1 | ||
Town 11 (2) | 2.4% | 53.4% | 91.0% | 81.8% | 54.6 ± 9.8 | 43.7 | 4.5 | ||