From: School-based healthy eating interventions for adolescents aged 10–19 years: an umbrella review
Author; year | Intervention design | Intervention description | Findings | Cochrane categorisation of effectiveness; JBI critical appraisal score |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bailey CJ et al., 2019 [36] | Study design: cross-sectional (n = 16), quasi- experimental (n = 13), qualitative (n = 7), mixed methods (n = 4), pre–post intervention (1), RCT (n = 1), longitudinal cohort (n = 1), observational (n = 1) Theories: SCT, TTM, TPB, HBM | Healthy eating education components: workshops, nutri-advice kiosk, cooking classes, quiz, games, field visits Contents: nutrition education, food safety, reading nutritional labels, healthy food purchase knowledge, farmers to visit schools to interact on healthy food cultivations School environment change component: school gardening, workshops with kitchen staff, canteen modification Contents: FV gardening, culinary lessons for kitchen staff and on-site chef consultations on healthy cooking, FV, milk, meat provision in canteen Duration of interventions: 1 week to 10 years Follow-up range: immediate to 2 years | 97% of the included studies reported improved healthy eating knowledge, increased FV, decreased processed snacks intake | Promising; 8 (high quality) |
Calvert S et al., 2019; [37] | Study design: RCT (n = 19), quasi-experimental (n = 7), cohort (n = 3) Theories: Not reported | Healthy eating education components: workshops, quiz, self-evaluation diary, self-assessment homework, entertainments, media shows (radio/TV), practical culinary lessons Contents: healthy eating education, handbooks, worksheets,, (e.g. problem solving, goal setting on healthy eating), computerised feedback, healthy cooking, media shows School environment change components: canteen modification Contents: increased availability of healthy foods Family involvement components: workshops, SMS, emails, homework, coupons Contents: information on healthy eating, heathy cooking via newsletters, feeding healthy foods to children, coupons for healthy food purchase Duration of interventions: 2 weeks to 3 years Follow-up range: 1 week to 4 years | 83% of the included studies reported increased FV, decreased SSB, fat, and processed snack intake, improved intake of recommended calories and protein | Promising; 8 (high quality) |
Champion KE et al., 2019 [44] | Study design: RCT (n = 14), quasi-experimental (n = 2) Theories: ASE model, Principles of interactive technology, SCT, SLT, TTM, TPB, HPM (pender’s), | Healthy eating education components:, online discussion boards, online games, SMS, emails, blog by health coach Contents: healthy eating lessons, knowledge and information via compact disc (CD), videos School environment change component: reduced price of fruit Family involvement component: healthy eating information handouts Contents: healthy eating information via newsletters, CD Duration of interventions: 1 month to 3 years Follow-up range: Immediately after intervention to 2 years | Inadequate evidence in improving healthy eating behaviour across all studies | No conclusion; 9 (high quality) |
Hackman et al., 2014 [38] | Study design: RCT (n = 8), quasi-experimental (n = 2), pre-post (n = 1) Theories: TRA, TPB | Healthy eating education components: workshops, conference, campaign, games, quiz, SMS, entertainment, rewards Contents: healthy eating lessons, healthy cooking lesson, healthy menu planning, healthy foods as rewards, role play, creative writing on healthy eating, poster, comic workbooks, theatre play School environment components: school food marketing, food provision Contents: provision of FV, taste testing, healthy food promotion in school Family involvement components: healthy eating information handouts Contents: nutritional needs for adolescents via newsletters Duration of interventions: 15 min to 1 year Follow-up range: not reported | 88% of included studies reported improved healthy eating knowledge and behaviour with increased FV, decreased snacks, high fat, SSB intake, increased intention for eating lunch in school | Promising; 8 (high quality) |
McHugh C et al., 2020 [39] | Study design: RCT (n = 9) Theories: SCT, TTM, TPB, SEM, Diffusion of innovation theory, ASE model, control theory, IMBSM | Healthy eating education components: workshops for staff and students Contents: food and nutrition lessons, drama workshops on healthy eating School environment change components: canteen modification, social food marketing, staff training Contents: restriction of unhealthy foods, increased FV and healthy snacks, healthy food promotion, staff training on healthy cooking Family involvement components: events with parents (meetings, workshops, invite to school meals, including them in school nutrition council group), healthy eating information handouts, loyalty programs Contents: adolescents’ healthy eating, healthy cooking recipes, healthy eating information via calendars, newsletters, magazines, incentives to purchase healthy foods Duration range: 8 months to 3 years Follow-up range: 1–3 years | Inadequate evidence in improving healthy eating behaviour across all studies | No conclusion; 8 (high quality) |
Medeiros et al., 2022 [45] | Study design: RCT (n = 24) Theory: Self-Regulation Theory, ASE Model, The action planning literature, Pedagogy of the Oppressed, by Paulo Freire, SCT, SEM, Bloom’s mastery of learning model, Bronfenbrenner’s ecological theory, TPB, TTM | Healthy eating education components: workshops Contents: healthy eating lessons School environment change components: canteen modification, postering, media marketing of healthy foods Contents: provision of healthy foods including FV, healthy eating posters around school premises, campaign on healthy eating Family involvement components: parents meeting, workshops, free healthy foods provision, Contents: healthy eating information discussion, leaflets, offering FV Duration range: 2 months to 3 years Follow-up range: Not reported | 70% of the included reviews reported increased intake of FV, protein, healthy snacks | Promising; 11 (high quality) |
Meiklejohn et al.; 2016 [40] | Study design: RCT (n = 13) Theories: SCT, TPB, Community-based capacity building approach | Healthy eating education components: workshops, games, entertainment Contents: healthy eating knowledge based lessons, food preparation, taste testing, drama School environment change components: gardening, postering, canteen modification, loyalty program Contents: FV gardening, posters display in lunch room on healthy eating, enhanced lunch session with healthy meals, replacing processed foods and SSBs with healthy foods and juice in vending machines, subscriptions (paying for regular access) to FV Family involvement components: parents’ meeting, loyalty program, healthy eating information handouts Contents: discussion on FV intake, meal preparation, money rewards for healthy feeding to their children, healthy eating information via newsletter, fact sheets, brochure, CD, magazine Duration range: 12 h to 12 weeks Follow up range: immediately after intervention to 2 years | Inadequate evidence in improving healthy eating behaviour across all studies | No conclusion; 9 (high quality) |
Nakabayashi J et al., 2020 [42] | Study design: RCT (n = 8), quasi-experimental (n = 6) Theory: TTM | Healthy eating education components: workshops Contents: healthy eating knowledge, behaviour, and goal setting worksheets Family involvement components: healthy eating information handouts SMS Contents: healthy eating behaviour, nutritional guidelines for adolescents via magazines, letters Duration range: 1 h to 3 years Follow up range: 1 week to 2 years | 86% of the included studies reported increased FV, decreased fat intake, balanced calorie intake | Promising; 7 (moderate quality) |
Pierre CS et al., 2021 [43] | Study design: Not reported Theories: TTM, SCT, TPB, ASE model | Healthy eating education components: workshops, visits by inspiring personalities, games, SMS, healthy eating club Contents: healthy eating and nutrition lessons, cartoon-style nutrition handbook, visits by athletes, dancers, club activities (healthy cooking, drama, role-playing, poster making, photography exhibition on unhealthy eating) School environment changes components: school-wide food marketing Contents: SNaX messages- promotional displays via digital media, posters on healthy snacks Family involvement components: Parents meeting, homework Contents: healthy eating education for adolescents, feeding healthy foods to adolescents at home Duration range: 1 month-1 year Follow-up range: Not reported | All included studies reported improved healthy eating knowledge and behaviour including increased FV, decreased SSB intake, willingness to try new healthy foods, increased frequency of breakfast consumption | Likely effective; 9 (high quality) |
Rose K et al., 2021 [31] | Study desing: Quasi-experimental (n = 11), RCT (n = 9), Qualitative (n = 4) mixed-method (n = 2), cross-sectional (n = 1) Theories: Not reported | Healthy eating education component: lectures, board game, instrumental SMS, nutri-active kiosks, drama, counselling via mHealth Contents: healthy eating, nutrition information via computer-generated tailored leaflet, nutritional behavioural counselling School environment changes components: Social food marketing, canteen modification Contents: daily free healthy meal, food choice towards plant based foods, chef demonstration, promotion of healthy snack purchases Family involvement components: Parents meeting Contents: healthy eating for adolescents Duration of interventions: Not reported Follow-up range: 4 weeks to 18 months | All included studies reported improved nutritional knowledge, increased FV, protein, decreased SSB, red meat, fat, processed snacks intake, improved frequency of breakfast consumption | Likely effective; 10 (high quality) |
Sa JD & Lock K, 2008 [32] | Study design: RCT (n = 6), non-RCT (n = 1) Theories: Not reported | Healthy eating education contents: workshops, peer-leading activities Contents: lectures on healthy eating and its promotion, peer-leaders to promote healthy eating knowledge School environment change components: canteen modification, loyalty programmes, gardening Contents: increased provision of FV- free and/or subsidised, FV gardening Family involvement components: healthy eating information handouts Contents: healthy eating behaviour for adolescents via newsletters Duration of interventions: Not reported Follow-up range: 12 months to 3 years | 70% of the included studies reported increased intake of FV | Promising; 9 (high quality) |
Shinde et al., 2023 [30] | Study design: RCT (n = 19), CBA (n = 8) Theories: SCT, CBT, TPB, HBM, Pedagogy of the Oppressed, Health action process approach, HPS, TRA | Healthy eating education components: workshop, quiz, games, healthy eating information handouts,, culinary activities, entertainments Contents: healthy eating knowledge, role-plays, blackboard writing on healthy and unhealthy foods, food classifications, food label reading information via booklets, brochures, posters, magazines, webpage, puppet shows, movies, food tasting, healthy cooking recipe School environment change components: canteen modification, training for school staff Contents: daily sell of fresh fruits, nutrition training session Family involvement components: workshops, healthy eating information handouts information provision- Contents: healthy eating behaviour for adolescents via booklets, brochures, blackboard writings, posters, slogans, news leaflets, healthy recipe guides Duration of interventions: 7 days to 3 years Follow-up range: 8 weeks to 28 months | 78% of the included studies reported improved healthy eating knowledge, increased FV, decreased SSB and processed food intake | Promising; 9 (high quality) |
Van Cauwenberghe Evet al., 2010 [34] | Study design: RCT (n = 5), non-RCT (n = 5), prospective cohort (n = 2), pre-post (n = 1) Theories: TPB | Healthy eating education components: workshops Contents: healthy eating lessons School environment change components: canteen modification,, loyalty programs Contents: healthy foods in canteen, FV distributions, subscription (paying for regular access) to healthy foods, and incentives for purchasing healthy foods Family involvement components: Parents meeting Content: discussion on promoting healthy eating behaviour among their children Duration of interventions: 1 week to 2 years Follow-up range: 2 weeks to 2 years | Inadequate evidence in improving healthy eating behaviour across all studies | No conclusion; 8 (high quality) |
Vézina-Im LA et al., 2017 [35] | Study design: RCT (n = 13), quasi-experimental (n = 11), pre–post (n = 12) Theories: SCT, TPB, DIT, ET, SDT, ELM, SRT, TIT | Curriculum components: workshops Contents: consequences of SSB intake, healthy eating goal setting, self-monitoring of eating behaviour School environment change components: canteen modification Contents: replacing SSB with healthier alternatives (milk, juice, water) in vending machine Family and community involvement component: parents’ meetings, social support groups, healthy eating information handouts Contents: healthy eating knowledge, parents and family involvement to share experience, challenges and encourage healthy eating behaviour, information distribution via newsletter, emails, postcards Duration range: not reported Follow-up range: not reported | 72% of the included studies reported decreased intake of SSB | Promising; 9 (high quality) |