Skip to main content

Table 1 Study eligibility criteria

From: The effectiveness and acceptability of physical activity interventions amongst older adults with lower socioeconomic status: a mixed methods systematic review

 

Inclusion

Exclusion

Population

• Community-dwelling adults aged ≥ 65 years from low socioeconomic status (SES)a groups/socioeconomically disadvantaged or deprived.

• Studies with mixed SES samples were included provided that > 50% were low SES or results were stratified by SES and it was possible to extract low SES results separately.

• Average (mean or median) age of sample < 65years

• Those not defined as being of low SES or socioeconomically disadvantaged or deprived.

• Non-community dwelling (e.g. individuals living in nursing/care/residential homes or hospices, hospital inpatients, prison inmates)

Intervention

• Any intervention aimed at promoting, encouraging, increasing, or maintaining physical activity.

• No limits on type of physical activity or how the intervention was delivered (i.e. self-directed or instructor led).

• Interventions targeting multiple health behaviours (e.g. weight management) including physical activity where physical activity data could be separated.

• Interventions targeting multiple behaviours where effects of the physical activity component could not be separated.

Comparator

• Any comparator group who did not receive the physical activity intervention (e.g. usual care, wait-list control, health education)

• Studies which did not include a comparator group (as described in the column to the left).

Outcome

Primary:

• Change in physical activity either self-reported (e.g. questionnaires, activity logs or diaries) or objectively measured (e.g. accelerometers, pedometers, smartwatches)

• Measures of acceptability including participant experiences, barriers, and facilitators

Secondary:

• Measures of physical function/fitness (e.g. gait speed, BMI, VO2 max, handgrip strength)

• Psychological/wellbeing measures (e.g. fear of falling, anxiety, depression, quality of life)

• Studies which did not report at least one of the primary or secondary outcomes specified in the review protocol (listed in the column to the left).

Study type

• Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods primary interventional studies:

 - randomised controlled trials & quasi-experimental (assessing intervention effectiveness)

 - focus groups, interviews, surveys, questionnaires (assessing intervention experiences/acceptability)

• Systematic and non-systematic reviews

• Individual case studies (n = 1)

• Study protocols

• Conference abstracts

• Commentaries/editorials/ letters

• Theses with no peer-reviewed publications

  1. aA broad definition of lower socioeconomic status was used (including multiple factors such as education, income, occupation, and area deprivation). We accepted study authors’ definitions of low socioeconomic status/socioeconomic deprivation or disadvantage. If a study described a population group as lower SES, it was included