Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.
Skip to main content
Fig. 6 | International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

Fig. 6

From: Comparing caloric restriction regimens for effective weight management in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Fig. 6

Forest plot showing overall comparisons among different caloric restriction regimens for secondary outcomes: A BMI; B Fat Mass; C Lean Mass; D Waist Circumference; E Fasting Glucose; and F HOMA-IR. Regimen comparisons are organized by efficacy. ADF: Alternate Day Fasting, TRE: Time-Restricted Eating, CER: Continuous Energy Restriction, STF: Short-Term Fasting, HOMA-IR: Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance, CI: Credible Interval

Back to article page

International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

ISSN: 1479-5868

Contact us