Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of schoolchildren (n = 1,618) in England and Scotland before and after the UIFSM policy

From: Evaluating the impact of the universal infant free school meal policy on the ultra-processed food content of children’s lunches in England and Scotland: a natural experiment

  

Pre-UIFSM (2008–2014)

Post-UIFSM (2014–2019)1

 

Characteristic

 

Intervention group

(n = 495, 51.2%)

Control group

(n = 471, 48.8%)

Intervention group

(n = 340, 52.1%)

Control group

(n = 312, 47.9%)

P-value2

Sex

n (%)

    

0.587

 Male

 

255 (53%)

257 (55%)

168 (50%)

167 (52%)

 

 Female

 

240 (47%)

214 (45%)

172 (50%)

145 (48%)

 

Ethnicity

n (%)

    

0.319

 White

 

421 (83%)

407 (83%)

274 (78%)

251 (78%)

 

 Ethnic minorities

 

74 (17%)

64 (17%)

66 (22%)

61 (22%)

 

Household Income (tertiles)

n (%)

    

0.627

 Lowest

 

154 (34%)

145 (32%)

90 (31%)

105 (37%)

 

 Middle

 

185 (38%)

193 (38%)

130 (35%)

110 (33%)

 

 Highest

 

156 (28%)

133 (29%)

120 (34%)

97 (29%)

 

IMD (quintiles)

n (%)

    

0.882

 Most deprived

 

106 (23%)

103 (23%)

82 (23%)

69 (23%)

 

 2

 

93 (19%)

87 (17%)

72 (22%)

59 (18%)

 

 3

 

100 (19%)

95 (19%)

56 (17%)

64 (20%)

 

 4

 

88 (19%)

80 (18%)

64 (20%)

48 (16%)

 

 Least deprived

 

108 (21%)

106 (24%)

66 (19%)

72 (23%)

 

Country

n (%)

    

0.452

 England

 

374 (91%)

329 (90%)

312 (93%)

280 (90%)

 

 Scotland

 

121 (9.5%)

142 (10%)

28 (7.3%)

32 (9.8%)

 

School lunch type

n (%)

    

< 0.001

 School meal

 

220 (46%)

193 (39%)

270 (78%)

156 (50%)

 

 Packed lunch

 

275 (54%)

278 (61%)

70 (22%)

156 (50%)

 
  1. 1 Threshold is September 2014 for English participants and January 2015 for Scottish participants
  2. 2 Wald test for difference across four groups (adjusted for complex survey sample)
  3. Note: UIFSM -Universal Infant Free School Meal; Intervention – Infants (4–7 years); Control – juniors (8–11 years); IMD – Index of Multiple Deprivation