Skip to main content

Table 4 Methodological considerations of included studiesa which applied ESM for quantitative dietary assessment

From: Experience Sampling as a dietary assessment method: a scoping review towards implementation

Author

ESM Sampling scheme

ESM questionnaire design

Signaling techniqueb

ESM duration

Frequency and timing of prompts

Dietary variable

assessed

Questions

Respond options

Rationale for questionnaire design

Respond window

[45,46,47,48]

SR

7 days

Between 7h30-22h30: 10 times per day, start-of-the day and end-of the day questionnaire

Snack consumption

Start-of-the day and end-of the day questionnaire: 37 item questionnaire (5 min). Random prompts: “Did you eat or drink anything between meals since the last beep?”

Yes/no respond option, if yes every product and quantity needed to be specified by a built-in search function based on the Dutch Food Composition Database. For every reported snack, participants chose between two quantity options: standardised quantities (i.e. one apple, one Mars candy bar) or in grams/milliliters. Products with undetermined quantities such as yoghurt and tea could be reported in relevant household measurements (i.e. a bowl or a cup) or in grams/milliliters. Products which were not available in the search function could be added manually

Not specified

Not specified

[51]

F

7 days

5 times per day: 10h00; 13 h; 16 h; 19 h; 22 h

Chocolate snack consumption

Number of consumed snacks since the last prompt and indication of the type of snack they had consumed in a text box

Possibility to register number of snacks consumed with open text field to indicate type of snack

Not specified

Not specified

[58]

F

6 days

6 times per day, every 2.5 h between 9h30-22h00

Food consumption

Participants indicated whether or not they had eaten in last 2.5 h

If participants reported they had eaten, they were prompted to provide a detailed list of foods eaten and the amount in a text box with no word limit. At the study’s in-person information session, participants were instructed to be as detailed as possible regarding what they ate and the amount

Not specified

30 min

[57, 59]

Actual intake: SR; habitual inake: R

4 weeks

Actual intake: 2 week days & 1 weekend day spread over 4 weeks: every 2-h and one morning question on previous night, habitual intake: 7 times per week during 4 weeks

Quantitative dietary intake, meal time (breakfast/lunch/dinner/snack)

Food intake during last 2 h

Subjects could choose from an extensive food

list, based on the Dutch Food Composition Database; Amount was reported in household measures (e.g., cups,

spoons), standard portion size (e.g., small, large) or amount in gram

Not specified

60 min. In reality, the 2hRs remained open until the end of the day

[56]

F

7 days

4 times per day: 8h00, 12h00, 16h00, 20h00

Quantitative dietary intake

Food consumed since last assessment

If participants endorsed food consumption since the last assessment, they were asked to indicate the largest quantity of food consumed during this period (snack, small meal, medium meal, or large meal)

Not specified

30 min

  1. a Manuscripts describing research based on the same study protocol were aggregated and described as one ESM study protocol in the table
  2. b Signalling techniques commonly applied in Experience Sampling protocols:
  3. R Random signalling: completely random timing of prompt messages between pre-defined (waking) hours, F Fixed signalling: prompt messages sent at predefined time(s), SR Semi-random signalling: prompt messages sent at random moments during predefined time windows, EC Event contingent sampling: self-initiated registering/responding when predefined event occurs, EOTDQ End-of-the-day-questionnaire: questionnaire sent at the end of the day at predefined time (often in combination with signalling  techniques)