Skip to main content

Table 2 Economic characteristics of the included studies (n = 16)

From: Behaviour change interventions to improve physical activity in adults: a systematic review of economic evaluations

Author, year

Economic evaluation

Perspective

Follow-up duration

Intervention costs per person $USD*

CHEC-list

score

Study conclusions

Certainty of evidence

Barrett, 2019

CEA

Hospital perspective

26 weeks

$177

15

Telephone coaching was a low-cost strategy for increasing MVPA and QALYs in insufficiently physically active ambulatory care hospital patients.

Moderate

Barrett, 2022

CEA

Healthcare funder

39 weeks

$83

15

Physical activity telephone coaching was a low-cost strategy for increasing MVPA and QALYs in insufficiently active ambulatory hospital patients.

Moderate

Brodin, 2015

CEA

Societal perspective

52 weeks

$1028

15

Ordinary physiotherapy was most cost effective with regard to quality of life.

Moderate

Broekhuizen, 2018

CEA

Societal perspective

37 weeks

$598

15

The intervention was cost-effective for QALYs.

Moderate

Buder, 2018

CUA

NS

52 weeks

$751

11

This health coaching intervention was deemed to be cost-effective.

Low

Crist et al., 2022

CEA

Payer perspective

104 weeks

$302

13

This study provides evidence of a highly cost-effective intervention to increase PA and improve QALYs in older adults over a 2-year period.

Moderate

Goyder, 2014

CEA

NHS societal perspective

39 weeks

$324

19

The lack of impact on objectively measured physical activity levels suggest that it is unlikely to represent a clinically effective or cost-effective intervention.

High

Ismail, 2020

CEA

Healthcare funder

52 weeks

$184

15

The individual interventions was not cost-effective at conventional thresholds

Moderate

Jacobs, 2010

CUA

Healthcare funder

52 weeks

$825

17

The intervention was cost-effective after 1 year of intervention.

Moderate

Khunti, 2021

CEA

NHS perspective

Lifetime horizon

$446

18

The economic evaluation showed that the intervention was not cost effective for changes in physical activity.

Moderate

Sangster, 2015

CEA

Partial societal perspective

42 weeks

$145

16

The Healthy Weight intervention is overall both less costly and more effective compared to the Physical Activity coaching intervention.

Moderate

Sevick, 2000

CEA

Clinician perspective

102 weeks

$618

15

The intervention in which participants are taught behavioral skills to increase their physical activity was more cost-effective than a structured exercise program in improving physical activity.

Moderate

Sevick, 2007

CEA

Payer perspective

102 weeks

$1298

16

The intervention provides an efficient approach to increasing physical activity.

Moderate

Sorensen, 2022

CEA

Healthcare funder

96 weeks

$508

15

The individually tailored intervention is effective at improving participants’ health status and reducing healthcare costs.

Moderate

Turkstra, 2013

CEA

Healthcare funder

102 weeks

$212

13

There was no intervention effect measured and ProActive Heart resulted in significantly increased costs. The cost per QALYs gained was high and above acceptable limits compared to usual care.

Moderate

vanKeulen, 2010

CEA

Healthcare funder

78 weeks

$155

15

The control group displayed the most cost-efficacy for the number of QALYs experienced over 73 weeks

Moderate

  1. CEA: Cost-effectiveness analysis; CUA: Cost-utility analysis; CVD: Cardiovascular disease; MVPA: moderate-to-vigorous physical activity; PA: Physical activity; QALYs: Quality-adjusted life years; WTP: Willingness-to-pay;
  2. * Intervention costs represented in 2021 $US
  3. a costs converted from to 2021 $US