Skip to main content

Table 5 Summary of results on quality assessment

From: Improving student diet and food security in higher education using participatory and co-creation approaches: a systematic review

 

Selection bias N (%)

Study design N (%)

Confounders N (%)

Data collection methods N (%)

Withdrawals and drop-outs N (%)

Global rating N (%)

Strong quality

3 (7%)

29 (66%)

29 (66%)

24 (55%)

15 (34%)

5 (12%)

Moderate quality

18 (41%)

15 (34%)

2 (5%)

6 (14%)

20 (45%)

23 (52%)

Weak quality

23 (52%)

0 (0%)

13 (30%)

14 (32%)

9 (20%)

16 (36%)