Characteristic | No. | % | References |
---|---|---|---|
Location | |||
USA | 17 | 89.5% | [95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105, 107,108,109,110,111, 113] |
Australia | 1 | 5.3% | [112] |
Sri Lanka | 1 | 5.3% | [106] |
Sample size (rural only) | |||
10–30 | 6 | 31.6% | |
31–50 | 5 | 26.3% | |
51–100 | 7 | 36.8% | |
> 100 | 1 | 5.3% | [105] |
Age | |||
Young + middle-aged (18–65) | 6 | 31.6% | |
Middle-aged + older (40+) | 2 | 10.5% | |
All age groups | 3 | 15.8% | |
Age range not reported | 8 | 42.1% | |
Gender | |||
Women only | 8 | 42.1% | |
Mixed | 11 | 57.9% | |
Data collection instrument | |||
Focus groups | 13 | 68.4% | |
Interviews | 6 | 31.6% | |
Photovoice | 1 | 5.3% | [110] |
Nominal Group Technique | 1 | 5.3% | [107] |
Analytical approach | |||
Content analysis | 2 | 10.5% | |
Thematic analysis | 2 | 10.5% | |
Grounded theory approach | 2 | 10.5% | |
Framework approach | 1 | 5.3% | [106] |
Phenomenological techniques | 1 | 5.3% | [104] |
Explanation building | 1 | 5.3% | [103] |
Nominal Group Technique | 1 | 5.3% | [107] |
Quality assessment | |||
High (85%) | 2 | 10.5% | |
Medium (60–84%) | 10 | 52.6% | |
Low (< 60%) | 7 | 36.8% |