Characteristic | No. | % | References |
---|---|---|---|
Location | |||
USA | 34 | 66.7% | [52, 54,55,56, 44, 43, 57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64, 48, 65, 66, 53, 67,68,69, 41, 45, 70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80] |
Australia | 4 | 7.8% | |
China | 4 | 7.8% | |
India | 2 | 3.9% | |
Japan | 2 | 3.9% | |
Other (Canada, Germany, Korea, Norway, South Africa) | 5 | 9.8% | |
Sample size (rural only) | |||
101–300 | 10 | 19.6% | |
301–500 | 10 | 19.6% | |
501–1000 | 8 | 15.7% | |
1001–2500 | 12 | 23.5% | |
> 2500 | 7 | 13.7% | |
N/A (aggregated data) | 4 | 7.8% | |
Age | |||
Young + middle-aged (18–65) | 5 | 9.8% | |
Middle-aged only (40–65) | 2 | 3.9% | |
Middle-aged + older (35+) | 8 | 15.7% | |
All age groups | 20 | 39.2% | [43,44,45, 47, 48, 54,55,56, 62, 64, 70, 72, 75, 78, 79, 81,82,83, 88, 91] |
Age range not reported | 16 | 31.4% | [52, 51, 57, 59,60,61, 63, 65, 53, 68, 69, 71, 84, 90, 76, 46] |
Gender | |||
Women only | 8 | 15.7% | |
Mixed | 43 | 84.3% | All others |
Types of PA | |||
Unspecified/total PA | 9 | 17.6% | |
MVPA | 21 | 41.2% | [41, 44, 48, 52, 54, 55, 58, 61, 64, 66, 70,71,72,73,74,75, 80, 85, 87, 90, 91] |
Leisure-time PA | 10 | 19.6% | |
Sports/exercise | 2 | 3.9% | |
Transport-related PA | 7 | 13.7% | |
Active commuting | 1 | 2.0% | [61] |
Total walking | 9 | 17.6% | |
Leisure/recreational walking | 5 | 9.8% | |
Walking for transport | 7 | 13.7% | |
Walking for commuting purposes | 3 | 5.9% | |
Cycling for commuting purposes | 3 | 5.9% | |
Total walking and cycling | 1 | 2.0% | [56] |
Car use (vs. walking) | 1 | 2.0% | [82] |
PA measures | |||
Device-based | |||
Accelerometers | 4 | 7.8% | |
Pedometers | 2 | 3.9% | |
Self-reported | |||
IPAQ | 14 | 27.5% | |
BRFSS | 11 | 21.6% | |
GPAQ | 2 | 3.9% | |
Other questionnaires | 21 | 41.2% | [81, 82, 51, 56, 58,59,60, 64, 65, 44, 88, 86, 47, 71, 74, 84, 46, 77,78,79,80] |
Environmental characteristics | |||
Availability and accessibility of destinations | 15 | 29.4% | [41, 43, 57, 58, 61, 62, 67, 74, 76, 79, 82, 85, 88, 89, 91] |
Availability and accessibility of places for exercise or recreation | 27 | 52.9% | [52, 81, 55, 43, 57,58,59,60,61,62, 64, 48, 65, 85, 53, 87, 41, 45, 70, 71, 74, 73, 75, 76, 91, 79, 80] |
Availability and accessibility of public transport | 9 | 17.6% | |
Overall accessibility | 6 | 11.8% | |
Density | 7 | 13.7% | |
Land use | 4 | 7.8% | |
Connectivity | 8 | 15.7% | |
Pedestrian infrastructure | 17 | 33.3% | [41, 43, 44, 54, 58, 61, 62, 64, 67, 72, 74, 76, 79, 80, 85, 89, 91] |
Cycling infrastructure | 6 | 11.8% | |
Safety and security | 26 | 51.0% | [54, 55, 44, 43, 83, 57, 42, 58, 61,62,63, 48, 85, 88, 67,68,69, 41, 89, 70, 74,75,76, 46, 91, 80] |
Aesthetics | 16 | 31.4% | [49, 50, 43, 83, 61,62,63, 85, 88, 68, 69, 47, 41, 89, 91, 80] |
Greenness/natural environment | 10 | 19.6% | |
Hilliness | 5 | 9.8% | |
Overall environment | 20 | 39.2% | [82, 55, 51, 56, 44, 49, 50, 43, 42, 62,63,64,65,66, 53, 41, 75, 90, 78, 79] |
Environment measures | |||
Geographic information systems (GIS) (objective) | 15 | 29.4% | |
Environmental audits (objective) | 3 | 5.9% | |
Questionnaires (subjective) | |||
NEWS | 7 | 13.7% | |
RALPESS | 5 | 9.8% | |
IPAQ-E | 3 | 5.9% | |
Other questionnaires | 29 | 56.9% | [54, 81, 82, 56, 44, 49, 50, 43, 42, 58, 62, 48, 65, 66, 88, 68, 69, 47, 41, 70,71,72,73,74, 84, 90, 76, 79, 80] |
Quality assessment | |||
Very high (100%) | 7 | 13.7% | |
High (85–99%) | 21 | 41.2% | [42, 45, 55, 59, 60, 62, 66, 68, 70, 72, 74, 75, 79, 81,82,83,84,85,86,87, 90] |
Medium (60–84%) | 21 | 41.2% | [58, 61, 63, 65, 54, 57, 43, 56, 64, 88, 73, 91, 67, 69, 41, 76,77,78, 80, 71, 89] |
Low (< 60%) | 2 | 3.9% |