Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of characteristics of included studies

From: A systematic review and narrative synthesis of physical activity referral schemes’ components

Characteristic

N (%)

Location

 UK

20 (35.0)

 Sweden

12 (21.0)

 New Zealand

6 (11.0)

 Spain

3 (5.0)

 Denmark

3 (5.0)

 Canada

3 (5.0)

 Australia

3 (5.0)

 USA

2 (4.0)

 Norway

1 (2.0)

 The Netherlands

2 (4.0)

 Mexico

1 (2.0)

 Finland

1 (2.0)

Year of publication

 1990 to 2000

4 (7.0)

 2001 to 2010

20 (35.0)

 2011 to 2022

33 (58.0)

Study design

 Experimental design

28 (49.0)

 Quasi-experimental design

12 (21.0)

 Observational

17 (30.0)

Comparison group1

 Usual care

14 (25.0)

 Advice only

5 (9.0)

 Standard/low-intensive PARS

11 (19.0)

 Prescription/referral only

3 (5.0)

 Other comparison

4 (7.0)

 No comparison

21 (37.0)

Sample size

 Total

44,690

 Median, Range

316 (14 to 6610)

14 to 250

27 (47.0)

251 to 1000

21 (37.0)

  > 1000

9 (16.0)

Outcomes1

 Physical activity

45 (79.0)

Subjective measure (e.g. questionnaires)

34 (75.6)

Objective measure (e.g. accelerometers)

4 (8.9)

Both

7 (15.6)

 Uptake

28 (49.0)

 Adherence

34 (60.0)

Follow-up

 No follow-up (mid-, post-scheme)

23 (40.0)

 1 to 6 months

20 (35.0)

 7 to 12 months

13 (23.0)

 24 months

1 (2.0)

  1. 1may be multiple per study, PARS physical activity referral scheme(s)