Table 1 Top 13 ranked criteria of local stakeholders and scientists. Please refer to Additional files 1 and 2 for criterion definitions
Local stakeholders | Scientists | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rank | Category | Criterion | Points | Rank | Category | Criterion | Points |
1 | Resources | Free of costs | 47 | 1 | Evidence | Efficacy | 35 |
2 | Sustainability | Longevity | 39 | 2 | Evidence | Potential for reach | 25 |
3 | Integration | Integration into everyday school life | 38 | 3 | Feasibility | Feasibility | 20 |
3 | Physical literacy | Teampromotion (cooperative and competition) | 38 | 3 | Acceptance and emotions | Child likeability/ acceptability | 20 |
5 | Staff, support, networking | Mentoring-model, training of school sports assistants (peers) | 37 | 5 | Evidence | Ease of implementation | 15 |
6 | Parents | Relevance to everyday life—transferability | 32 | 5 | Evidence | Sustainability | 15 |
7 | Staff, support, networking | Organisation | 31 | 5 | Acceptance and participation | Participation/ stakeholder involvement (children, school staff, parents, policymaker) | 15 |
8 | Staff, support, networking | Qualification | 29 | 5 | Other | Systems-approach | 15 |
9 | Physical literacy | Self-efficacy / learning success | 26 | 9 | Evidence | Positive implementation trial | 10 |
10 | Staff, support, networking | Feasibility—support | 22 | 9 | Resources | Intervention cost | 10 |
10 | Acceptence and emotions | Attractiveness | 22 | 9 | Adaptability | Tailoring | 10 |
10 | Other | Complexity | 22 | 9 | Adaptability | Reducing inequalities | 10 |
13 | Resources | Funding | 20 | 9 | Acceptance and emotions | Enjoyment | 10 |